top of page

Immunity in Physiological Context

The immune system necessarily operates within the overall physiological context of the host. The condition of the host prior to infection can have profound consequences on the quality of defense and the ultimate outcome of infection. Host metabolic state and competing physiological demands can directly and indirectly constrain immune performance, resulting in tradeoffs between immunity and other traits that are important for fitness. Our lab studies the integration of the immune system with other aspects of host physiology from both mechanistic and evolutionary perspectives.

Immunity and Reproduction

Robin slide.jpg

D. melanogaster males transfer a protein called "Sex Peptide" (SP) to females during mating. This protein stimulates the female to produce Juvenile Hormone (JH). JH helps activate egg development, but it is also immunosuppressive. Female D. melanogaster therefore become more susceptible to bacterial infections after mating.

Over more than 15 years of research, we have shown that reproductive investment constrains immune performance in D. melanogaster. Reproductively active females are less able to control bacterial infections than unmated females and are significantly more likely to die from infection.  This increased susceptibility arises within as little as two hours of mating, which is far too early for it to reflect a direct cost of producing eggs. Instead, we have found that mating stimulates the female to synthesize Juvenile Hormone (JH) due to the action of a protein called "sex peptide" that is transferrred from the male in the seminal fluid. JH both promotes oogenesis and suppresses immune defense. Ongoing research in our lab is testing the mechanisms by which JH suppresses host immunity, as well as the mechanisms by which the reciprocally-acting hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) potentiates the immune system.

​

Our current data suggest that JH-mediated immunosuppression may not be an adaptive response. Rather, the compromised immune defense may arise because of physiological constraints. Insects rely on an adipose tissue called the “fat body” for both systemic immune defense and production of egg yolk, as well as for metabolic control and detoxification of xenobiotics. Our results indicate that this tissue can become overwhelmed if it is trying to simultaneously address too many competing pressures, resulting in failure of immune defense. In ongoing experiments, we are testing whether the observed tissue stress is a direct consequence of JH signaling and whether it can be mitigated with improved nutrition or other physiological manipulations.

Immunity and Metabolism

Mounting an immune response is incredibly energetically demanding. Activation of the immune system requires mobilization of cellular energy, and sustained infection drains metabolic stores. Regulation of the immune response is therefore mechanistically linked to metabolic regulation, and dietary nutrition can have an enormous impact on capacity for immune defense. Our research team and others have shown that D. melanogaster and other insects become more susceptible to infection when they are provided with high-sugar diets. Conversely, diets that are high in protein can promote immunity. Remarkably, however, individuals in natural populations of D. melanogaster show genetic diversity in their immunological sensitivity to diet. This “genotype-by-environment interaction” means that some individuals are genetically predisposed to suffer much greater reductions in immune defense when provided with high-sugar diets.

 

Crucially, the host is itself the environment in which the infecting pathogen lives. D. melanogaster provided with high-sugar diets become hyperglycemic and hyperlipidemic. This extra sugar and fat inside the host body may be acquired by the pathogen, promoting pathogen proliferation and increasing infection severity. This can happen independently of any direct effects of metabolic state on immune system function. The distinct effects of metabolic state on host immune function and pathogen growth potential could synergize to dramatically alter host sensitivity to infection, depending on the pathogen capacity to access host nutrients and the host immunological response to increased pathogen proliferation.


In ongoing research, we are testing mechanisms by which diet can influence the quality of the immune response and we are evaluating the responsiveness of various bacterial pathogens to host metabolic state. Because metabolic regulation and bacterial infection mechanisms are very highly conserved across all animals, our conclusions from the D. melanogaster experimental system are likely to have broad relevance to bacterial infections of other animals including humans.

fly feeding.jpg
diet_effects.jpg

The quality of antibacterial immune defense in D. melanogaster and other insects is influenced by the quality of their diet. Flies provided with high-sugar diets are more likely to die from their infections (left) and carry higher pathogen burdens (right). In contrast, insects given high-protein diets are more resistant to infection. This is partly due to linkages between the immune system and metabolic signaling, including insulin signaling and TOR signaling. It is also because altered metabolic state of the host changes the nutritional environment experienced by the pathogen, affecting pathogen growth and behavior. 

Life History Tradeoffs Against Immunity

tradeoff.jpg

Classical life history theory describes the relationships among traits that separately increase health or fitness. The theory dictates that energetic expenditure or developmental investment in one trait can correspondingly decrease the quality of other traits if they are mechanistically linked or share a common resource pool. In the context of our experiments, we observe such a tradeoff in the early phases of bacterial infection, where the rate of egg-laying decreases as the host fights the infection. At the population level, there may arise genetic diversification for different life history strategies. For instance, some genotypes could invest preferentially in immune defense at the expense of short-term reproduction, pursing a strategy of long life with sustained, moderate reproductive output. Alternatively, other genotypes might favor elevated reproduction at the cost of reduced resistance to infection, producing many offspring rapidly at the risk of early death from infection. (Interestingly, we tend not to see this pattern in our data; rather, the tradeoffs seem to be physiologically dynamic and not genetically hardwired.) Furthermore, tradeoffs between traits can be shaped by the environment. In good nutritional conditions, it could be possible to sustain high levels of immune defense even while producing offspring, whereas in poor nutritional conditions, energetic or cellular resources might need to be allocated to one trait or the other. Our lab uses life history theory to evaluate the relationships between immunity and other fitness-related traits.

D. melanogaster genotypes that have high resistance to infection show reduced fecundity when dietary protein is limited (top panel), indicating a life history tradeoff between infection resistance and reproductive output. However, no tradeoff is observed when dietary protein is ample (bottom panel). Thus, the tradeoff between immunity and fecundity can be alleviated adequate nutrition. 

Key Publications

Immunity and Reproduction

Adhikari, K., F. Ali, M.A. Malo, and B.P. Lazzaro (2025) Ovariole number does not predict reproductive output or trade off with immunity in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 20: e0333046. [pdf]

​

Gordon, K.E., S. Ray, P. Gonzales, M. Li, C. Liang, J.M. Marcin, M.F. Wolfner and B.P. Lazzaro (2025) Trade-off between bacterial immune defense and oogenesis progression in female Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 231:iyaf151. [pdf]

​​

Adhikari, K. and B.P. Lazzaro (2025) Reciprocal costs of infection and reproduction in D. melanogaster. Biology Letters 21:20240475. [pdf]

​

Keith, S.A. (2023) Steroid hormone regulation of innate immunity in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genetics 19:e1010782 [pdf]

​

Gordon, K.E., M.F. Wolfner and B.P. Lazzaro (2022) A single mating is sufficient to induce persistent reduction of immune defense in mated female Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Insect Physiology 140:104414 [pdf]

​

Gupta, V., A.M. Frank, N. Matolka and B.P. Lazzaro (2022) Inherent constraints on a polyfunctional tissue lead to a reproduction-immunity tradeoff. BMC Biology 20:127 [pdf]

​

Wigby, S., S. Suarez, B.P. Lazzaro, T. Pizarri and M.F. Wolfner (2019) Sperm success and immunity. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 135:287-313 [pdf]

​

Schwenke, R.A. and B.P. Lazzaro (2017) Juvenile hormone mediates resistance to infection in female Drosophila melanogaster. Current Biology 27:596-601. [pdf]

 

Schwenke, R.A., B.P. Lazzaro, and M.F. Wolfner (2016) The basis for immunity-reproduction tradeoffs in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 61:239-256 [pdf]

​

Short, S.M. and B.P. Lazzaro (2013) Reproductive status alters transcriptomic response to infection in female Drosophila melanogaster. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 3:827-840 [pdf]

​

Short, S.M., M.F. Wolfner and B.P. Lazzaro (2012) Female Drosophila melanogaster suffer reduced defense against infection due to seminal fluid components. Journal of Insect Physiology 58:1192-1201 [pdf]

Immunity and Metabolism

Darby, A.M., S. Keith, A.A. Kalukin and B.P. Lazzaro (2025) Chronic bacterial infections exert metabolic costs in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Biology 228:jeb24924. [pdf]

​

Darby, A.M., D.O. Okoro, S. Aredas, A.M. Frank, W.H. Pearson, M.S. Dionne, and B.P. Lazzaro. (2024) High sugar diets can increase susceptibility to bacterial infection in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Pathogens 20:e1012447. [pdf]

​

Darby, A.M. and B.P. Lazzaro (2023) Interactions between innate immunity and insulin signaling in insects. Frontiers in Immunology 14:1276357 [pdf]

​

Unckless, R.L., S.M. Rottschaefer and B.P. Lazzaro (2015) The complex contributions of genetics and nutrition to immunity in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genetics 11(3): e1005030. [pdf]

 

Howick, V.M. and B.P. Lazzaro (2014) Genotype and diet shape resistance and tolerance across distinct phases of bacterial infection. BMC Evolutioary Biology 14:56 [pdf]

 

Fellous, S. and B.P. Lazzaro (2010) Larval food quality affects adult (but not larval) immune gene expression independent of effects on general condition. Molecular Ecology, 19:1462-1468 [pdf]

Life History Tradeoffs

Adhikari, K., F. Ali, M.A. Malo, and B.P. Lazzaro (2025) Ovariole number does not predict reproductive output or trade off with immunity in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 20: e0333046. [pdf]

​​

Gordon, K.E., S. Ray, P. Gonzales, M. Li, C. Liang, J.M. Marcin, M.F. Wolfner and B.P. Lazzaro (2025) Trade-off between bacterial immune defense and oogenesis progression in female Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 231:iyaf151. [pdf]

​

​Adhikari, K. and B.P. Lazzaro (2025) Reciprocal costs of infection and reproduction in D. melanogaster. Biology Letters 21:20240475. [pdf]

 

Schwenke, R.A., B.P. Lazzaro, and M.F. Wolfner (2016) The basis for immunity-reproduction tradeoffs in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 61:239-256 [pdf]

​

Short, S.M., M.F. Wolfner and B.P. Lazzaro (2012) Female Drosophila melanogaster suffer reduced defense against infection due to seminal fluid components. Journal of Insect Physiology 58:1192-1201 [pdf]

 

McKean, K.A. and B.P. Lazzaro (2011) “The costs of immunity and the evolution of immunological defense mechanisms.” In Molecular Mechanisms of Life History Evolution , A. Heyland and T. Flatt, eds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK [pdf]

​

Short, S.M. and B.P. Lazzaro (2010) Female and male genetic contributions to female post-mating susceptibility to infection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 277:3649-3657 [pdf]

​

Lazzaro, B.P. and T.J. Little (2009) Immunity in a variable world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, series B – Biology, 364:15-26. [pdf]

 

McKean, K.A., C.P. Yourth, B.P. Lazzaro and A.G. Clark (2008) The evolutionary costs of immunological maintenance and deployment. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8:76 [pdf]

bottom of page